Serna Free XML Editor Goes Open Source - Interview with Ilia Kuznetsov, Syntext COO

Serna Free on Vista

Serna Free on Vista

Syntext is a XML content solutions provider based out of Seattle, Washington. A week ago Syntext announced the upcoming release of its popular Serna Free XML Editor as open source software. Serna is Syntext’s flagship product, a powerful and easy-to-use WYSIWYG XML editor based on open standards and running on all major platforms.

LiveTechDocs is committed to give back to the open source community and offers free accounts to open source projects. We are very impressed with Syntext move to open the code of their XML Editor, so we reached out to the team to understand how it happened.

Ilia Kuznetsov, Syntext COO, was kind enough to answer our questions, and gives great insight below about the open source community and the future of collaboration.

ltd-logo-smallHow did you come up with the idea, and decide to open-source Serna Free?

ilia-small

Syntext has always been a “geek” technical team enjoying to work on the free platforms like FreeBSD and Linux. By the way the proof-of-concept version of Serna was programmed on FreeBSD (mostly using gcc and XEmacs), and we moved to Linux as it started to evolve more dynamically, and years later to Windows and Mac OS X. Serna could not have been possible without some fundamental Open Source components such as James Clark’s SP, for example. We used other pieces such as Aspell, OpenSSL, WebDav Neon.

We always wondered how the open source business model worked. But, maybe, we did not have enough impulse or courage to move to it, although we loved and used Open Source idea, Linux, KDE, Open Office, OpenVZ, etc…

The world financial crisis situation, which the IT market has clearly felt (with a revenue drop of 50%-60%), has made us think that we have to approach very differently our business. And the problem for us is that we are a small team with a killer dynamic XSL technology (that lets users work with information as simple as a document page, while the information is composed on-the-fly from different data-sources such as DB’s, filesystem data) but we do not have a complete solution, which our most important competitors have.

And the users want to solve *their* simple problem: they do not want to pay for forming documentation as many times as they republish it, and the users *do not care* about payment for an XML editor. Because it is not enough to solve the problem.

That’s why making Serna free for the end users is beneficial for all: end-users, enterprises and partners.

But the impulse itself came “incidentally”. Absolutely unexpectedly in February I got an e-mail from Susanne Oberhauser (a super-programmer from Suse Linux, whose mindset and professionalism I always adored), just a howdy letter. Since 2003 she occasionally tried to convince us to move to the Open Source way. And I think her February e-mail was right on time, and enlightening for our following decision to make the open source release happen.

ltd-logo-smallHow did the Open Source community react and offer to contribute?

ilia-small

It has shown an extremely encouraging reaction. Even though the Serna Free tarball is not available to the general public yet (only to some partners at this point), we got quite some e-mails from people who are eager to start hacking the code.

That’s not all. I am excited to tell you about my visit to Nuremberg, Germany, the city of Suse Linux origin. There was such a desire to help us from the Novell people, or people of around-Suse community, that I was literary shocked that external people could believe into our project as much as this. Because not only the programmers, but also sales, marketing professionals, and even investment-related people offered their help and participation.

ltd-logo-smallWhat are the best Open Source tools available today for XML technical documentation projects?

ilia-smallBecause the community doesn’t really have an affordable, easy to install (or easy to start) full XML solution, each best Open Source XML tool is more or less “the only XML tool” for a given function. A lot of people use Emacs, Vim, Saxon, FOP, DITA Open Toolkit, but you can understand it does not bring the mass usage of XML. In large companies when the groups of technical writers or engineers see that they have to hack tags and peer into XML parser output, it makes them scared. It pushes people away from XML documentation technology.

I started writing software requirements for Serna in Docbook with XEmacs+PSGML, and now I believe society gets a truly unique opportunity to use an Open Source WYSIWYG editor which our enterprise customers always compare to the market dominant Epic and XMetal. There is no Open Source alternative to Serna now.

ltd-logo-smallWhich XML standards are most popular within the Open Source writing community?

ilia-smallDocbook and DITA. DITA is a very recent invention, but very powerful. At first I personally looked at DITA suspiciously as it is  a technology that IBM wants to push (or will fail to push), but it happened not to be not just this. When we polished Serna to work well with DITA, we realized its power and converted Serna documentation from Docbook to DITA, and even all our web-site content to DITA. I personally believe in DITA. And we are eager to help this well-thought architecture to get more and more usable for people.

ltd-logo-smallHow will collaboration impact the way technical writing tools will be evolving in the near future?

ilia-smallThis has already impacted writing tools. For complicated products and especially those with long life cycles (software, aircraft, medical equipment) at some point you simply fail if you continue to use traditional word processor. At some point in time every company understands it has to switch to XML documentation. It only depends on when they realize it: after they are 3-month late to the market because of content reformatting, or after they spent yet another 3 millions for merging changes from different departments… and reformatting them all over again…

The support for granularity will be enhanced. The technical writing tools will not stick to simple XML Entities, XIncludes, or DITA xrefs. They will learn to work with arbitrary granularity independently of other content within the single chunk of content. I would like to mention in this case the X-Hive’s Docato (recently acquired by EMC).

And I believe the documentation tools supporting collaboration will get easier to use and cheaper so that a team of 3-5 not highly-technical people would prefer to work with formats that naturally support the granularity, such as XML, rather with conventional word processors. And it is Syntext’s mission to make this future closer.

Obviously the web-oriented (SaaS) approach is also a forthcoming step. But right now the web technologies do not yet support very complex requirements of large enterprise customers. It is hard to make predictions. There is a ton of ways to evolve web-oriented collaboration work… But I wonder how soon Google Docs-like services will merge with XML-supported content management available to the masses…

iliaIlia Kuznetsov, Syntext COO, graduated from Moscow State University Physics Department in 1997. With a small group of enthusiasts he started Syntext the same year. In 2003, Syntext released the first version of Serna. Ilia is also involved in other activities such as startup management and consulting, crisis management, and corporate management practices.

Posted in XML Tools & Services | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

XMLMind Brings Structured Content Edition to the Cloud

XMLMind XML Editor (aka XXE) is one of the most powerful software available for structured XML content edition. It makes building DocBook and DITA documents relatively easy. XXE has been around for quite a few years, and when we asked our community for feedback a month ago we received nothing but positive comments. The editor comes in a free Personal Edition and a licence-based Professional Edition.

A few days ago, XMLMind released the new 4.4 version of XXE, with a bundle of changes, fixes and improvements. The new feature we found the most interesting is the possibility of editing documents with XXE directly from a browser.

XXE in the Browser

XXE in the Browser

If you are a user of the Professional Edition, here’s the exciting news: you will now be able to use XXE from any connected device, anytime, anywhere. XXE is going to the cloud with its new Java based applet. Your machine will need to have the latest version of Java runtime (1.6.0_10) along with a few other requirements. XXE as an applet comes in different flavors with its viewer, editor and complete versions.

Being able to access an application from the browser is a great feature and technical accomplishment. Adding collaboration features seems the logical and most desirable next step on a user standpoint, it is not clear however whether this is the intended direction of XXE by its parent company, Pixware.

Demos of the applets are available. The explanations may not be crystal clear, but here’s the upside: it works! Please let us know if you had a chance to play with the demo and tell us what you think in the comments!

Posted in XML Tools & Services | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

LiveTechDocs Shows A New Face

LiveTechDocs unveiled a new design of its publicly accessible website. Our new motto: Get it done!

LiveTechDocs claims that documentation review should be easy, fast and enjoyable. Our new website intends to reflect just that.

LiveTechDocs new homepage welcomes visitors with a video that gives a two-minute overview of the application, showing how Peter Gibbons, Michael Bolton and Bill Lumbergh successfully review a document called “TPS report” using LiveTechDocs. We hope the reference will be appreciated…

The new Benefits and Features sections take the perspectives of LiveTechDocs users (Reviewers, Writers, Managers and Company) to show how the application benefits each of them during the documentation review process.

The new Plans section introduces the on-demand premium plans which will be rolled out in Q3 2009 when LiveTechDocs exists its current Beta stage.

Since a picture speaks a thousand words, here is LiveTechDocs homepage before and after the redesign. Let us know what you think in the comments!

LiveTechDocs HomePage - Before

LiveTechDocs HomePage - Before

LiveTechDocs HomePage - After

LiveTechDocs HomePage - After

Posted in Announcements | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Live Technical Writing Series - Meet Terry Smith

Terry Smith

Terry Smith

Terry Smith is a technical consultant, communicator, and Senior Member of the STC Carolina chapter, passionate about the tools and processes that make it possible to create high-quality documentation.

Terry gave a much anticipated talk about “Online Review with Adobe Acrobat” during the STC Conference on May 5th. You can follow her on twitter at @tesmith

ltd-logo-smallWhat are the three things you love the most about being a technical writer?

terry_s_thumbThe thing I love most about being a technical communicator is knowing that I have made a product easier to understand and use. Writing well challenges me; clean, simple writing is hard work! I like setting up the document structure and formatting, too.

Although you didn’t ask, I must add that what I dislike is the need to drop an unfinished project to work on something that suddenly became urgent. Online reviews help me stay organized because I can see exactly where I stopped. I can even see the date of the last change, which really helps me restart tasks quickly.

ltd-logo-smallIf you were going to a desert island and were only allowed to bring DocBook, DITA, or nothing at all, what would you choose and why?

terry_s_thumbWhich would be better for smashing open a coconut? On a desert island, I would want the most versatile tool possible, of course. I would definitely want some kind of structure. If nothing at all means I could create my own XML structure from scratch, I’d probably choose that.

Given the choice between DocBook and DITA, I’m torn. DocBook is mature and has elements for just about anything necessary for print. DITA is most suited for online documentation; it’s the up-and-coming youngster that claims to be able to do everything with ease via specializations. DocBook might be too much baggage for carrying around a desert island. DITA specialization is never as easy as it sounds. Hmm. Perhaps I had best just pack a knife and a Wilson volleyball.

ltd-logo-smallDuring your typical documentation project, which tool or software do you use the most, which one do you prefer using, and which one do you wish existed?

terry_s_thumbThe tool I use most is FrameMaker. For any workflow that includes PDF output, FrameMaker is still my tool of choice. FrameMaker handles structured documentation, including DocBook and DITA. The tool I use most after FrameMaker is Adobe Acrobat, which supports online review.

Of course, FrameMaker has its idiosyncrasies. In FrameMaker, the document structure and its formatting are wedded and it’s not always easy to reconcile FrameMaker’s needs with XML’s needs. The view in the document window is identical to the PDF output—although you can make the element tags visible or open the structure view in a separate window. In a dedicated XML editor like oXygen or XMetal, while writers don’t work in a document view that is a perfect match to the PDF output, writers can see a code view of the underlying XML that isn’t possible in FrameMaker.

The perfect tool doesn’t exist yet, but I would like a tool that lets me see a code view of the underlying XML and also produces beautiful PDF output easily.

ltd-logo-smallIf you had a magic wand that could change one thing about the documentation reviewing process as you know it, what would it be? Do you have a fun anecdote to illustrate life without a magic wand?

terry_s_thumbIf I could wave my magic wand, then I would place a spell on the reviewers to make them review the documentation! Every technical communicator knows that the closest thing to magic fairy dust is to entice reviewers with baked goods or chocolate.

In all seriousness, I do wish I had a single process that worked for everybody. While I am a fan of online reviews, not everyone is. Programmers and subject matter experts who are in remote locations tend to prefer online reviews. Editors and others who are accustomed to the convenience of writing on a stack of paper despise online reviews, because the online tools are comparatively slow and clumsy.

I have yet to see an online review tool that would allow a reviewer to compare two or more pages at one time like can be done by spreading out paper pages. I most often use Adobe Acrobat for review because it’s the most like reviewing on paper, which makes it easier for me to get my reviewers to use the tool.

ltd-logo-smallHow does online collaboration work in your documentation projects? Do you have a favorite LiveTechDocs feature?

terry_s_thumbWhen I start an online review, I send the PDF file by email or post it to a location where all the reviewers can access it. The reviewers add their comments, respond to each other’s comments and my questions, and then I mark the comments as complete when I incorporate them.

The reviewers can see that I have changed the status of the comment and the date when I did that. Most of the time, I cut and paste the comments into the original document. With the latest version of Adobe Acrobat, I can automatically import some types of comments directly into the FrameMaker source file and then use FrameMaker’s track changes features to accept or reject the imported comments.

Even if I import the comments automatically, I still change the status of each comment in the original document to show how I handled the comment. It’s a manual step, but it lets the reviewers know the status of their review comments before the next review cycle and serves as a permanent archive of when the changes were made.

I have begun evaluating LiveTechDocs. My favorite feature is the intuitive web interface. Uploading documents into the repository is a snap. LiveTechDocs has some workflow support: reviewer adds comments, writer incorporates comments, and project manager signs off on comments.

ltd-logo-smallAs an online collaboration for technical documentation review expert, what pieces of advice would you give us at LiveTechDocs to help us delivering an optimal solution to our users?

terry_s_thumbThe workflow support in LiveTechDocs is nifty. I realize that LiveTechDocs is still in beta; ideally, LiveTechDocs would validate any XML against a supplied DTD. If LiveTechDocs did this, then it would definitely be worthwhile to consider for review of any structured documentation!

Posted in Technical Writing | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

LiveTechDocs new release: simpler, better, faster!

We are very happy to announce a new release with a slew of improvements that will make documentation review and collaboration on LiveTechDocs even simpler, faster, and better.



1. Enhance support for modular Docbook

Enhanced support for modular DocBook

Enhanced support for modular DocBook

No need to upload the final documentation file; we let you upload all your modular XML files, may they be chapters, sections, or anything else. We improved support for xincludes and entities and can process book definition files that reference modular content through xincludes or entities.

2. Email digest service

Email digest service

Email digest service

We turned email notification into a useful alert; emails triggered after a new comment is posted contain the block content commented, the user comment together with the discussion thread. A link lets you jump right on LiveTechDocs and view where the comment has been attached.

3. Better XML files round-tripping

Better XML files round-tripping

Better XML files round-tripping

This one should please many writers and reviewers! We enhanced support for round-trips reviews; what it means is that writers download the XML file with comments, update it, upload it online and notify reviewers of changes without loosing track of previous comments.


4. Simplified dashboard

Simplified Dashboard

Simplified Dashboard

The Dashboard got a lot simpler; you either view your own comment (new post or reply to existing one) or all project comments; a color icon on each comment row and column sorting makes it easy to identiy the right discussion.


5. Easier project administration

Easier project administration

Easier project administration

It’s never fun to manage projects, users, and permissions. Now, adding users only requires the users’ emails; roles assignment can be done from the project properties or by editing the user profile




Posted in Announcements | Leave a comment

Web Content Conference 2009: What’s in it for XML Technical Writers? (A Free Pass, For One)

webcontent09125x125On June 15th and 16th in beautiful Chicago, the Web Content Conference will be packed with insightful talks about how to deliver personalized dynamic web content.

The conference program primary focus is on marketing, that is how well managed web content can help a website get more traffic, a community get more members, and users get more satisfaction.

So what’s in it for XML Technical Writers whose documentation is not specifically geared towards digital content? We give you three good reasons to attend.

1.  LiveTechDocs offers one full access ticket to the conference! Be the first person to leave a comment on this post explaining why you want to go and we’ll offer you a $895 value conference pass.

2. The Web is not just an avenue for content anymore, it is becoming the converging point of all content avenues. How do you prepare and adapt to this when producing content? The Web Content Conference is a great place to find answers to these questions, and we particularly recommend attending the talk and subsequent workshop held by Joe Gollner: Beyond Publishing: Exploring What We Are Really Doing With Web Content and Engineering Web Content: A Workshop in Two Parts

3. Scott Abel is a personality we all know and respect in the technical communication World. He built from the ground up The Content Wrangler, a vibrant community of technical writers and content specialists that keeps growing and giving everyday. Better than following him on twitter, you can hear him talk live about his experience and lessons learned while building a community in the session 10 Web 2.0 Marketing Techniques You Can Use To Attract New Prospects and Extend Your Reach

    In addition to these sessions, we’re also very excited to hear Jonathan Sapir talk about the benefits of Situational Applications, which we understand as on-demand applications that solve a specific problem, like, say, LiveTechDocs fulfills the documentation review collaboration needs. For instance…

    Posted in Industry News & Events | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

    SourceForge’s Community Choice Awards: We Say DocBook!

    At LiveTechDocs we are huge fans of the Open Source community. We use, appreciate and support open source software on a daily basis. To give back to the community, we are preparing a special offer to open source project documentation managers, so they can enjoy the full benefits of online collaboration review. One project that is particularly close to our heart is DocBook, the XML single-sourcing documentation standard. Today the LiveTechDocs on-demand application fully supports DocBook v4.X and v5.0 documentations.

    CCC09SourceForge has recently opened nominations for its annual Community Choice Awards, so this is a great opportunity to show the DocBook community some love!

    Nominations are open until May 29th, and we have nominated DocBook in the Best Project for the Enterprise category. If you want to do the same, click here!

    There are lots of beautiful open source projects out there, if you’re a big fan of another project, tell us about it in the comments section, we’d love to hear from you.

    Posted in DocBook & DITA | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

    Live Technical Writing Series - Meet Ivan Walsh

    Ivan Walsh

    Ivan Walsh

    Ivan Walsh is a technical writer based in Shanghai, China. Ivan provides documentation services to a range of clients across Asia and the Middle East. Read more at: www.ivanwalsh.com

    Ivan was kind enough to play the interview game with us and provide personal experience, perspective and useful tricks for the technical writing community. We hope you enjoy reading him as much as we do, thanks Ivan!

    ltd-logo-smallWhat are the three things you love the most about being a technical writer?

    ivanwalsh-thumb1Maybe a little background on how I got into this field would put things into perspective. I started as a programmer many years ago and found that, while I liked coding, I often ended up as the intermediate between the software team and the client. I’ve always had fairly strong verbal skills and, being Irish, have a natural predisposition to chat to people anyway. These communications skills helped in the transition to tech writing, which brings me to our first point.

    1. Technical writing is about learning.
    If you want to succeed in this field, you need an appetite for learning; a real hunger to know and understand how things work. I’ve always had a keen interest in technology and my career over the past 15 years has allowed me to satisfy my own intellectual curiosity. There is always something new to learn. It really isn’t enough to have to document an application. At some point, you have to want to help the reader genuinely understand how this works. To share what you’ve learnt and hope this makes their experience of the product that little bit better.

    2. Technical writing is about organization.
    Most tech writers are fastidious and like to organize bits of information. For example, while I would never say I’m the greatest writer in the world, my editing skills are quite good. Without really trying, I find errors in text, layout, and typography that most people don’t see. Distilling random bits of information into a more organized format can brings its own reward.

    3. Technical writing is about teaching.
    One of the misconceptions about Technical Writing is that it’s a solitary profession. While there are phases when I need to close the door and write for the afternoon, an equal amount of my time is spend talking to developers and clients (i.e. understanding the application) and holding workshops and sessions where we discuss the results. So, the role of a tech writer is as much about sharing information as it is about writing.

    ltd-logo-smallIf you were going to a desert island and were only allowed to bring DocBook, DITA, or nothing at all, what would you choose and why?

    ivanwalsh-thumbI saw Tom Hanks in Cast Away and I believe his life would have been considerably easier if he had built his raft based on the founding principles of DITA.

    Ok, maybe not, but I gained considerable exposure to DITA when working for a large US technology firm and, after some initial skepticism, was impressed with the end product.

    The XML tool, in conjunction with DITA, enabled us to create chunks of text that could be exported to different platforms quite successfully. While there was an initial learning curve involved, it proved to be a more flexible and pragmatic solution than writing the documents into other tools.

    ltd-logo-smallDuring your typical documentation project, which tool or software do you use the most, which one do you prefer using, and which one do you wish existed?

    ivanwalsh-thumb1. Microsoft Word – most clients generate their documents in Word, so updating and developing documents is generally in this package. I’ve learned how to get the most from it and use macros to automate manual tasks. I’ve recently made an aim to use Google Docs as much as possible and see if I can perform my word processing tasks over the web. I’m about to buy a netbook and this will save me the expense of getting Microsoft Office installed. So far I’ve been impressed with Google Docs, especially so of the round-tripping to Word.

    2. Camtasia Studio – a lot of my work involves online documentation and preparing tutorials. I try to convince (i.e. persuade) clients to use video to accompany the print manuals and use it to demonstrate how their products work. We create product demos and promotional material with Camtasia and it really is a joy to work with. Camtasia Studio beats the opposition hands down.

    3. Speech recognition software – the amount of typing I do would be seriously reduced if I could find reliable speech recognition software. I’ve tried some products without success as I had to decipher what the product showed me and gave up.

    ltd-logo-smallIf you had a magic wand that could change one thing about the documentation reviewing process as you know it, what would it be?

    ivanwalsh-thumbMy father worked in the auto industry for many years. His company heard something interesting about their rival’s quality control process. Instead of checking the cars at the end of the production cycle, they were checked as early as possible. At each phase in the production cycle, the car was assessed and sent back if defects were identified. The rationale was that detecting errors early in the cycle disallowed other defects from arising.

    I mention this as I’m surprised that document reviews occur so late in the development cycle. If smaller, more focused reviews occurred earlier, I believe the product and documentation would be delivered to a higher quality and also faster.

    Do you have a fun anecdote to illustrate life without a magic wand?

    A junior tech writer joined us a few years back. He liked to impress us with the speed in which he could docs out the door. A fatal flaw in this industry, by the way. He used the Autocorrect function in Word for finishing his words automatically. This makes sense to a point. Unfortunately, a document was later retuned by a client asking who was the IT Mange referred to in the document. Somehow ‘Manager’ and ‘Mange’ were switched in the auto-correction process. I think the moral was to slow down and check the documents by hand. Word lacks divine abilities.

    ltd-logo-smallHow does online collaboration work in your documentation projects? Do you have a favorite LiveTechDocs feature?

    ivanwalsh-thumbCompanies are always looking for ways to reduce costs, especially in today’s economic climate. Recently we completed a project for a US non-profit where we used open source and freely available tools, such as Google Docs. While there was a few teething pains, we managed to write the documents online, use the platform to review and add comments without the overheard of using Microsoft Office applications.

    For the organization in question, online collaboration meant they could keep their team in the field AND get the material delivered on time.

    As software products become more sophisticated and development teams are increasingly distributed across the globe, collaboration is becoming the norm and not the exception.

    Products live Skype, Google Docs and LiveTechDocs enable companies to make these advances and distribute information secure and efficiently.

    ltd-logo-smallIs being a technical writer in China different in any way than, say, in the United States?

    ivanwalsh-thumbYes and no. I still have a lot of legacy clients from the US and, from their point of view, nothing has changed. From my office here in Shanghai, I can deliver material to clients over the web.

    In China, Technical Writing is gaining recognition as they move further up the value chain. US companies are out-sourcing their tech docs here to cut costs and avail of other incentives.

    Chinese companies are starting to target the US market. Many of these have been setup or funded by US investors and demand high-quality documentation to accompany their product sets. They know the integrity of their products will be damaged by ‘chinglsih’ user guides and garbled text. So, there is a culture change here.

    It’s a good time to be a tech writer here in China. Long may it last!

    Posted in Technical Writing | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

    Technical Communication Summit 2009 - LiveTechDocs Wish List

    stc-conference

    The STC 56th annual conference is only a few days away, and its program is packed with interesting and valuable talks and sessions. In fact, we counted about 150 planned meetings, sessions and events. To navigate through this wealth of information and build your conference menu a-la-carte, the STC offers a very valuable tool, the Itinerary Planner. If you’re heading to Atlanta this weekend, we recommend you take it for a spin to make your conference planning less overwhelming.

    If you are, like us, hungry for information about XML documentation reviewing and collaborative tools, you may want to check out our wish list of the 3  sessions we really wouldn’t want to miss:

      1. Online Review with Adobe Acrobat with Terry Smith
      May 5th, 8:30AM to 10:00AM, Room Hanover C

      Terry Smith is a technical consultant, communicator, and Senior Member of the STC Carolina chapter, passionate about the tools and processes that make it possible to create high-quality documentation.

      We found a presentation support of an earlier version of the talk (the document is dated 2005) and shared it with you at the end of this post. We were happy to recognize the exact same hurdles LiveTechDocs is solving, and really appreciated Terry’s cost-effective and pragmatic approach of making documentation review easier by enabling online collaboration using available tools, namely Adobe Acrobat.

      If you have tested this approch, make sure to let us know in the comments section!

      2. Collaborating Around the World with Kirsty Taylor
      May 5th, 10:30AM to 12:00PM, Room Dunwoody

        This interesting talk with Kirsty Taylor will give out clues and tips to help you collaborate with your internationally distributed documentation team members. At LiveTechDocs, we focus heavily on the hard features of collaboration, but the soft ones (cultural, dealing with time zones)  are also very important and impact productivity too!

        3. Useful Shareware for Technical Communicators with Ed Marshall
        May 6th, 10:00AM to 11:00AM, Room Hanover D:

          Ed Marshall combines 20 years of experience as a technical writer with an expertise of software and information tools. In this session Ed will uncover a goldmine of valuable and cost-effective (or free) tools for technical writers. Will LiveTechDocs be part of them? We sure hope so!

          Posted in Industry News & Events | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

          Interview with Richard Hamilton, author of Managing Writers

          Managing Writers Cover

          Managing Writers Cover

          Richard L. Hamilton is the author of the excellent, recently published book Managing Writers: A Real World Guide to Managing Technical Documentation. After  managing technical documentation for more than 10 years, Richard gives us in this book a goldmine of useful and practical advice for managing documentation. When we heard about the book (thanks Scott Abel!) we read a copy right away and liked it so much that we came back for more and asked Richard for an interview focused on managing documentation review and XML schemas myths and realities.

          Enjoy!

          LiveTechDocs

          In Managing Writers, you offer very useful methodologies for Documentation Managers to improve project management by developing healthy, productive relationships with the Writers. Documentation review can become a project bottleneck, independently of the Writers, as it requires the involvement of many Reviewers who are only partly dedicated to the Documentation.  What can Managers do to make sure that the documentation review is as efficient and enjoyable as possible for everyone?

          richardhamilton-smallThis can be tough. In Agile environments, for example SCRUM, reviews are built into the sprints and a sprint cannot be called done until all of the reviews are done. In more traditional environments, you may need to work harder to get reviews into the schedule. However, I think getting reviews into the development schedule is important.  The other thing that helps is for managers to build relationships with those who manage the engineers their team supports. Finally, include reviews in your schedule and review your schedule in project status meetings. Since reviews often occur in the busiest part of a project it can be hard, but persistence and visibility help. You also, of course, need to make the review process as painless as possible for all involved.

          ltd-logo-smallWhat methods or tools can help Reviewers provide accurate feedback and Writers manage it all?


          richardhamilton-smallThe key is to keep the whole process simple and easy for reviewers. Reviewers should not have to exert any effort beyond reviewing and writing comments. This means making content available in an easy to read form (online is great, but other formats, even print, may be necessary at times) and making it simple for reviewers to write comments.

          Second, pick the right people to do the review and target reviews to as few people as required to get what you need. Few things bug
          reviewers more than having to review something outside of their area of responsibility or expertise.

          Third, writers need to work with reviewers ahead of time to schedule review time and make sure the reviewer is committed and has adequate time. Writers should treat reviewers time as sacred and make sure they don’t waste their time with unnecessary reviews of material that is either not ready or already reviewed.

          Finally, follow-up. Writers should not be shy about following up to be sure reviews are happening, to query reviewers about their comments when they aren’t clear, and to thank their reviewers when they’re done.

          ltd-logo-smallAs a Documentation Manager, what metrics could be used to measure the performance of the reviewing process?


          richardhamilton-smallI tend to be cautious around metrics. That said, I think it makes sense to keep track of how well reviewers and writers meet their milestones. It’s also good to talk with reviewers periodically to see if they are satisfied with the process.

          I do not like to track metrics like the number of comments as a quality measure. Anything you track is likely to cause some change in behavior. If you consider fewer comments to be “better,” you can bet you will get fewer comments, possibly losing important information. If you consider more comments to be “better,” you can bet you will get more comments. In neither case are you likely to get higher quality comments.

          ltd-logo-smallIn the section of Managing Writers dedicated to XML schema choice, you advise Managers to thoughtfully weigh in their options in deciding whether to implement DocBook or DITA XML schema. When walking documentation conferences or looking at documentation billboards, all one can see is DITA. Why is that? What should Managers make of this?

          richardhamilton-smallSometimes a technology gets hot, and DITA is certainly hot. Since conference managers and program committees want to attract lots of people to their conferences, they will favor hot topics. I do think that popularity is a factor to consider in selecting a schema, but it should not be at the top of your list. Unless a particular technology does what you need it to do, it doesn’t matter how popular it is.

          The question for managers is whether the technology is evolving, whether they can get the technical assistance they need, and most important whether the technology will help them achieve their business goals. I think you can say yes for the first two for DocBook and DITA, and of course, the answer for the third question depends on your business goals.

          ltd-logo-smallYou mentioned in Managing Writers that more people use DocBook than DITA. Is it possible to estimate how many people or projects use DocBook and how many use DITA?

          richardhamilton-smallWhile DITA is gaining users quickly, there is a lot of existing content in DocBook. DocBook has been around for nearly 20 years, and has been used by many companies and open source projects.  You can see a partial list of DocBook users at http://wiki.docbook.org.

          Also, while this is far from a scientific survey, I did a quick search for “-//OASIS//DTD DITA” (the DITA DOCTYPE) on Google and got about 300 hits. A search for “-//OASIS//DTD DocBook” yields over 7,000 hits.  While un-scientific, I think it shows a large body of DocBook content that flies below the radar.

          ltd-logo-smallManaging Writers depicts the DocBook community as vibrant, active and supportive. As a Manager who has just chosen to go with DocBook, where do I find the community, and what support can I expect from it?

          richardhamilton-smallI’d start with the DocBook mailing lists on OASIS. You can find them at: http://docbook.org/help. This page also has references to other resources. The mailing lists, esp. docbooks-apps, are great for technical and non-technical queries, including detailed questions. The list is active and lively. Queries there will get a quick response, often from members of the DocBook Technical Committee, which manages the standard, and other experts.

          Right now, the main printed reference, DocBook: The Definitive Guide, is being revised for the latest version, DocBook 5.0, and the current printed edition is out of date.  You can get to the latest version online at http://docbook.org, and a new edition of the printed book should be out later this year. The other essential resource for power users is Bob Stayton’s DocBook XSL: The Complete Guide, which has everything you need to know about the DocBook stylesheets.

          To be clear, while I am a long time user of DocBook (my book was authored in DocBook 5.0, and I used the DocBook stylesheets to generate all aspects of the book except the cover art and two SVG figures), I am not religious about DocBook. There are clearly situations where I would recommend DITA without reservation.

          ltd-logo-smallLastly, as a Documentation Manager, what features would you like to see on LiveTechDocs to better manage documentation review?

          richardhamilton-smallI spent some time on the site over the last few days and it looks like you have some good capabilities there. I think a few things would make it even easier to use:

          1. make it easy for a writer to generate a URL that will take a reviewer directly to the document being reviewed.
          2. integrate with CMS/versioning so that an author can easily update the version being reviewed.
          3. make signing up reviewers as easy as possible. Ideally, they could be signed up by authors so that even the first time in, all they’d need to do is follow a link to the document and go.
          4. Another thought is that it might be good to include information on the review pages that would help the reviewer. For example, you might let writers include the schedule, contact information, and anything else that would make life easier for reviewers.

          Overall, I think you have a good capability that should make it easier for reviewers, writers, and managers to do their work.

          Thank you very much Richard!

          You can learn more about the Managing Writers at XML Press book and purchase it on Amazon.

          Posted in Collaboration & Project Mgt, Technical Writing | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment